On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:33:23AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > [ 175.612999] ? nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store+0x13d/0x160 [nvmet] > > Hmm, as qid_max is more or less a copy of existing attributes it might > not the only attribute store operation which has this problem. D'oh, the port online check is obviously wrong... working on a fix.
