On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:44:05AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On the patch itself, it definitely makes sense in the context of ublk. > My hesitation is mostly around not really wanting to export this to > generic modular users. It's OK for core interfaces, of which ublk is > on the way to becoming, but I really don't like the idea of random > modules using it. But that's not really something we can manage with > the export, it's either exported or it's not... Yes, I'm really worried about folks doing stupid things with it. Thinking of the whole loop saga..
