On 8/10/22 10:09 AM, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> +static inline struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> + struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
> + struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
> +
> + return vq;
> +}
Would probably be cleaner as:
static struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
return &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
}
dropping the 'vq' variable, and also dropping the inline as the compiler
will work that out anyway.
Apart from that minor nit, looks good to me.
--
Jens Axboe
