On 7/26/22 5:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 05:06:19PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Since this clashes with opf changes from Bart, would you mind spinning >> them against the for-5.20/drivers-post branch? > > Actually. The conflict seems to be that for-5.20/drivers-post still > has the blkcg_bio_issue_init in __blk_queue_split that went away > in for-5.20/block. So while I can resend against drivers-post, that > seems somewhat counterproductive. Can you make sure the series applies to my for-next? Then I'll create a temp branch for it. -- Jens Axboe
