Re: [PATCH 15/20] block, blksnap: snapshot image block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
>> +static int snapimage_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> +				  struct request *rq, unsigned int hctx_idx,
>> +				  unsigned int numa_node)
>> +{
>> +	struct snapimage_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
>> +
>> +	kthread_init_work(&cmd->work, snapimage_queue_work);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> I'm a little confused on why this both has a blk-mq interface and
> the new bio filter interface.  Whow is going to submit I/O to this
> blk-mq interface?
> 

Sorry, it seems to me that I didn't understand this comment.

The module creates a block device for each snapshot image.
To make a backup of a block device, the backup tool reads snapshot image.
This snapshot image block device allows to mount a file system on it
and perform the necessary preparation. If not for this requirement,
it would be possible to implement reading via an additional ioctl.
But that wouldn't be a good design, I think.

Perhaps I have implemented this block device incorrectly?
Processing requests of the snapshot image block device is started
in the function snapimage_queue_rq(). And ends in the 
snapimage_queue_work() in another kernel thread. Therefore, when
the request is initialized in snapimage_init_request(), a kernel worker
is prepared.

>> +	//.open = snapimage_open,
>> +	//.ioctl = snapimage_ioctl,
>> +	//.release = snapimage_close,
> Please don't leave commented out code around.
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux