Re: [PATCH 0/6] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:14:00AM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> This adds support for the REQ_OP_VERIFY. In this version we add

IMO, VERIFY is a useless command.  The history of storage is full of
devices which simply lie.  Since there's no way for the host to check if
the device did any work, cheap devices may simply implement it as a NOOP.
Even expensive devices where there's an ironclad legal contract between
the vendor and customer may have bugs that result in only some of the
bytes being VERIFYed.  We shouldn't support it.

Now, everything you say about its value (not consuming bus bandwidth)
is true, but the device should provide the host with proof-of-work.
I'd suggest calculating some kind of checksum, even something like a
SHA-1 of the contents would be worth having.  It doesn't need to be
crypto-secure; just something the host can verify the device didn't spoof.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux