在 2022/06/26 0:41, Jens Axboe 写道:
On 6/25/22 2:36 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
? 2022/06/24 0:26, Michal Koutn? ??:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 08:27:11PM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here we may allow to dispatch a bio above current slice's
calculate_bytes_allowed() if bytes_skipped is already >0.
Hi, I don't expect that to happen. For example, if a bio is still
throttled, then old slice is keeped with proper 'bytes_skipped',
then new wait time is caculated based on (bio_size - bytes_skipped).
After the bio is dispatched(I assum that other bios can't preempt),
With this assumptions it adds up as you write. I believe we're in
agreement.
It's the same assumption I made below (FIFO everywhere, i.e. no
reordering). So the discussed difference shouldn't really be negative
(and if the assumption didn't hold, so the modular arithmetic yields
corerct bytes_skipped value).
Yes, nice that we're in aggreement.
I'll wait to see if Tejun has any suggestions.
I flushed more emails from spam again. Please stop using the buggy
huawei address until this gets resolved, your patches are getting lost
left and right and I don't have time to go hunting for emails.
My apologize for that, I'm quite annoied that our IT still can't solve
this. I'll stop sending new emails with this address for now..
Thanks,
Kuai
