Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:48:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> Hi Ming, >> >> I wrote this against your devel-v3 branch. I'm wondering if you plan to >> send a new version of the kernel patch soon? From the latest > > Yeah, that is on my todo list: > > https://github.com/ming1/linux/commits/my_for-5.19-ubd-devel_v3 > > there has lots cleanup & improvement. > >> discussions, I don't think there were major issues found on review. :) > > One problem is the driver name, and Christoph thought we have > 'arch/um/drivers/ubd*.c'. Not thought of one good candidate yet. Hi Ming, Thanks for the info, and sorry for not noticing the fix merged on Jun, 3rd on the master branch. I will follow that branch when testing and submit fixes I find along the way. I guess you have considered a lot of names, but I'd suggest any of: * blkuser, * ublk * BUSE (as in Block FUSE, though there is another non-upstream project with that name), * UBIO (as in UIO, but for Block IO) * B2U (Block IO Backed by userspace) :-P TBH, my favorite is ublk. Thank you, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
