[PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable
From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 19:56:35 +0200
Cc: <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Hello,

In this series are BFQ upstream fixes that didn't apply to 5.10 stable tree
cleanly and needed some massaging before they apply. The result did pass
some cgroup testing with bfq and the backport is based on the one we have
in our SLES kernel so I'm reasonably confident things are fine.

								Honza

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] bfq: cgroup fixes for 5.10 stable
  - From: Greg KH
- [PATCH 4/6] bfq: Get rid of __bio_blkcg() usage
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 1/6] bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parents
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 2/6] bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 5/6] bfq: Make sure bfqg for which we are queueing requests is online
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 3/6] bfq: Remove pointless bfq_init_rq() calls
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH 6/6] block: fix bio_clone_blkg_association() to associate with proper blkcg_gq
  - From: Jan Kara

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/6] bfq: Drop pointless unlock-lock pair
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/6] bfq: Avoid merging queues with different parents
Previous by thread: [PATCH] lib/sbitmap: Fix invalid loop in __sbitmap_queue_get_batch()
Next by thread: [PATCH 6/6] block: fix bio_clone_blkg_association() to associate with proper blkcg_gq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux