Hello Kuayi. On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:58:11PM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If new configuration is submitted while a bio is throttled, then new > waiting time is recaculated regardless that the bio might aready wait > for some time: > > tg_conf_updated > throtl_start_new_slice > tg_update_disptime > throtl_schedule_next_dispatch > > Then io hung can be triggered by always submmiting new configuration > before the throttled bio is dispatched. O.K. > - /* > - * We're already holding queue_lock and know @tg is valid. Let's > - * apply the new config directly. > - * > - * Restart the slices for both READ and WRITES. It might happen > - * that a group's limit are dropped suddenly and we don't want to > - * account recently dispatched IO with new low rate. > - */ > - throtl_start_new_slice(tg, READ); > - throtl_start_new_slice(tg, WRITE); > + throtl_update_slice(tg, old_limits); throtl_start_new_slice zeroes *_disp fields. If for instance, new config allowed only 0.5 throughput, the *_disp fields would be scaled to 0.5. How that change helps (better) the previously throttled bio to be dispatched? (Is it because you omit update of slice_{start,end}?) Thanks, Michal