Re: [PATCH 1/4] workflows/Kconfig: be consistent when enabling fstests or blktests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:21:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/13/22 12:38, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > We have two kconfig variables which we use to be able to express
> > when we are going to enable fstests or blktests, either as a dedicated
> > set of tests or when we want to enable testing both fstests and blktests
> > in one system. But right now we only select this kconfig variable when
> > we are using a dedicated system. This is not an issue as the kconfig
> > is a kconfig symbols are bools which are set default to y if either
> > the test is dedicated or not.
> > 
> > But to be pedantic, and clear, let's make sure the tests select the
> > respective kconfig for each case as we'd expect to see it. Otherwise
> > this can confuse folks reading this.
> 
> Is this patch perhaps intended for the kdevops project? If so, please add a
> prefix to make this clear (git format-patch --subject-prefix) when sending
> kdevops patches to Linux kernel mailing lists.

Yeah good idea for it to go into the [PATCH kdevops]. Thanks!

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux