On 3/30/22 7:02 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:09:21PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: >> Ok. If you are open to take new opcode/struct route, that is all we >> require to pair with big-sqe and have this sorted. How about this - > > I would much, much, much prefer to support a bigger CQE. Having > a pointer in there just creates a fair amount of overhead and > really does not fit into the model nvme and io_uring use. > > But yes, if we did not go down that route that would be the structure > that is needed. IMHO doing 32-byte CQEs is the only sane choice here, I would not entertain anything else. -- Jens Axboe
