On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:32 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:09:21PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: > > Ok. If you are open to take new opcode/struct route, that is all we > > require to pair with big-sqe and have this sorted. How about this - > > I would much, much, much prefer to support a bigger CQE. Having > a pointer in there just creates a fair amount of overhead and > really does not fit into the model nvme and io_uring use. Sure, will post the code with bigger-cqe first. > But yes, if we did not go down that route that would be the structure > that is needed. Got it. Thanks for confirming.
