Re: [Drbd-dev] state of drbd in mainline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 2022-03-29 09:32, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:22:26AM +0200, Philipp Reisner wrote:
Hi Christoph,

what do you expect for the DRBD changes? Usually, they fall into the
category: yes, obviously. When you are changing the block layer in this
way, then that is necessary for the in-tree DRBD code.

Regarding users: Yes, there are users of the in-tree DRBD code. Very big corporations. And, yes, we see pressure building up that we get our act
together and re-sync the in-tree DRBD with the out-of tree DRBD.

The complete lack of bug reports and maintainer interaction usually
suggests low to no use and heavy bitrot.  If that is not the case
here that's fine, just asking..

_______________________________________________
drbd-dev mailing list
drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-dev

We use the in-tree DRBD with LTS (actually 5.15.32 and 5.4.188) and depend on it. It just works. We never had any issues in the last 5 years.

Regards
--
Wolfgang Walter
Studentenwerk München
Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux