[PATCH] block: fix misleading comment for major number of block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually the maximum dynamic major number of block device will
be BLKDEV_MAJOR_HASH_SIZE-1, so just fix the function comment
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/genhd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index c9a4fc90d3e9..0965f10813da 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void blkdev_show(struct seq_file *seqf, off_t offset)
  *    then the function returns zero on success, or a negative error code
  *  - if any unused major number was requested with @major = 0 parameter
  *    then the return value is the allocated major number in range
- *    [1..BLKDEV_MAJOR_MAX-1] or a negative error code otherwise
+ *    [1..BLKDEV_MAJOR_HASH_SIZE-1] or a negative error code otherwise
  *
  * See Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt for the list of allocated
  * major numbers.
-- 
2.27.0






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux