Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: remove kiocb.ki_hint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/8/22 5:55 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:05:28 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> This field is entirely unused now except for a tracepoint in f2fs, so
>> remove it.
>>
>>
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/2] fs: remove kiocb.ki_hint
>       commit: 41d36a9f3e5336f5b48c3adba0777b8e217020d7
> [2/2] fs: remove fs.f_write_hint
>       commit: 7b12e49669c99f63bc12351c57e581f1f14d4adf

Upon thinking about the EINVAL solution a bit more, I do have a one
worry - if you're currently using write_hints in your application,
nobody should expect upgrading the kernel to break it. It's a fine
solution for anything else, but that particular point does annoy me.

So perhaps it is better after all to simply pretend we set the
hint just fine? That should always be safe.

What do you think?

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux