Re: [PATCH 10/17] block: wire-up support for plugging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:40:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 06:10:08PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 2:04 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:50:58PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add support to use plugging if it is enabled, else use default path.
>
> The subject and this comment don't really explain what is done, and
> also don't mention at all why it is done.

Missed out, will fix up. But plugging gave a very good hike to IOPS.

But how does plugging improve IOPS here for passthrough request? Not
see plug->nr_ios is wired to data.nr_tags in blk_mq_alloc_request(),
which is called by nvme_submit_user_cmd().

Yes, one tag at a time for each request, but none of the request gets
dispatched and instead added to the plug. And when io_uring ends the
plug, the whole batch gets dispatched via ->queue_rqs (otherwise it used
to be via ->queue_rq, one request at a time).

Only .plug impact looks like this on passthru-randread:

KIOPS(depth_batch)  1_1    8_2    64_16    128_32
Without plug        159    496     784      785
With plug           159    525     991     1044

Hope it does clarify.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux