On 3/1/22 03:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It would be nice to just calculate the sector from the previous > bio using bio_end_sector, but that doesn't really work with the > current blk_next_bio pattern. It might make sense to just take the > initial allocation case out of blk_next_bio and do that manually now > that the bio_alloc interface makes a lot more sense. > I found existing pattern easier to read with blk_next_bio(), as removal of blk_next_bio() will result in the duplication of code for allocation which blk_next_bio() avoids, unless I didn't understand your comment. -ck
