On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 6:51 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage.. > > I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is > to address the existing point points we have and take advantage of > having folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which > otherwise would take years. > > I'll throw at least one topic out: > > * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks: > - are we really happy with the status quo? > - if not what outlets do we have? Many choices were discussed/implemented in my last attempt to do append via io_uring/aio. Without consensus though. Perhaps F2F can help reaching it. I'd like to join this discussion. > I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared > discussion though and should not make it part of the BoF. Yes indeed, there is more to it. We may anyway have to forgo append (and other-commands requiring extra result) in the first drop of uring-passthru at least. For good reasons. But let's discuss that in a separate thread along with some code. Thanks, -- Kanchan
