On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:58AM +0000, Matias Bjørling wrote: > Good idea to bring up zoned storage topics. I'd like to participate as well. > > Best, Matias I'm also working on zoned storage ATM so count me in as well. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2022 02.33 > To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lsf-pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Matias Bjørling <Matias.Bjorling@xxxxxxx>; Javier González <javier.gonz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@xxxxxxx>; Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Keith Busch <Keith.Busch@xxxxxxx>; Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@xxxxxxx>; Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@xxxxxxx>; Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@xxxxxxxxx>; Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage > > On 3/2/22 16:56, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage.. > > > > I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is to > > address the existing point points we have and take advantage of having > > folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which > > otherwise would take years. > > > > I'll throw at least one topic out: > > > > * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks: > > - are we really happy with the status quo? > > - if not what outlets do we have? > > > > I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared discussion > > though and should not make it part of the BoF. > > Since I'm working on zoned storage I'd like to participate. > > Thanks, > > Bart.
