Re: block loopback driver possible regression since next-20220211

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/18/22 8:10 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> I noticed that since next-20220211 losetup fails at something stupid
> simple:
> 
> losetup $LOOPDEV $DISK
> 
> I can't see how the changes on drivers/block/loop.c would cause this,
> I even tried to revert what I thought would be the only commit which
> would seem to do a functional change "loop: revert "make autoclear
> operation asynchronous" but that didn't fix it.
> 
> I proceeded to bisecting... but I did this on today's linux-next,
> and well today's linux-next is hosed even at boot. My bisection then
> was completley inconclusive since linux-next is pure poop today.
> 
> Any ideas though?
> 
> Fortunately Linus' tree is fine.
> 
> I'm quit afraid that we wouldn't have caught this issue. Seems pretty
> straight forward. It would seem we don't have such a basic thing on
> blktests, so I'll go add that...

My guess would be that it's:

commit fbdee71bb5d8d054e1bdb5af4c540f2cb86fe296
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jan 4 08:16:47 2022 +0100

    block: deprecate autoloading based on dev_t

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux