>> since if I remember correctly we need to define a event class >> instead of duplicating a tracepoint with similar reporting. > > Very good point. I did overlook it. The original post did have disk > name and didn't have cmd, now the two tracepoints look much more > similar than the original post, so I agree the duplicate could be > combined into an event class. > I sent out a V7 with a prep patch and testlog keeping your original authorship from this patch. If you find anything wrong with that please send out V8 on the top of V7. >> >> -ck >> >>
