On 2/3/22 08:06, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:01:13AM +0000, Adam Manzanares wrote: >> BTW I think having the target code be able to implement simple copy without >> moving data over the fabric would be a great way of showing off the command. > > Do you mean this should be implemented instead as a fabrics backend > instead because fabrics already instantiates and creates a virtual > nvme device? And so this would mean less code? > > Luis > This should not be implemented on the fabrics backend at all or even in nvme-loop. Use QEMU for testing memory backed features. -ck
