On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:15:09AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > Round and round we go.. Pretty tired of this. Same here. > You are perfectly fine with incrementally compromising request-based > DM's ability to evolve as block core does. I would not word it that way, but I think we mean the same thing. Yes, I do not want to add more hooks for a complete oddball that has no actual use case. dm-rq does a good enough job for SCSI and has all the infrastucture for it. We should not more cruft to exteded it to use cases for which there is no consesus and which are much better covered by alredy existing code in the kernel.
