On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 07:32:24AM +0100, Miko Larsson wrote: > 'strlcpy()' shouldn't be used, and should be replaced with safer > alternatives. Cristoph Hellwig suggested [1] that 'kmemdup_nul()' should > be used in two cases instead of 'strscpy()', and that a regular > 'strcpy()' should be used in the third case. [2][3] Not that strcpy isn't really safer, but if your plan is to get rid of strlcpy I think it makes more sense there. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
