On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:52:26AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Fixes: 1ebe2e5f9d68e94c ("block: remove GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT") > > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Not sure why I didn't spot this until now, but: > > drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c: In function ‘add_mtd_blktrans_dev’: > drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:362:30: error: ‘GENHD_FL_NO_PART’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN’? > 362 | gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN > drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:362:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > Hmm? > > I'm going to revert this one for now, not sure how it could've been > tested in this form. It was tested in a tree that also contains the commit identified by the Fixed tag, which is in the for-next tree but not the block-5.16 one.