Hi Jens,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:52 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:04 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > mtdblock / mtdblock_ro set part_bits to 0 and thus nevever scanned
> > partitions. Restore that behavior by setting the GENHD_FL_NO_PART flag.
> >
> > Fixes: 1ebe2e5f9d68e94c ("block: remove GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT")
> > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > @@ -355,9 +355,11 @@ int add_mtd_blktrans_dev(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *new)
> > "%s%c%c", tr->name,
> > 'a' - 1 + new->devnum / 26,
> > 'a' + new->devnum % 26);
> > - else
> > + } else {
> > snprintf(gd->disk_name, sizeof(gd->disk_name),
> > "%s%d", tr->name, new->devnum);
> > + gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
> > + }
>
> Not sure why I didn't spot this until now, but:
>
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c: In function ‘add_mtd_blktrans_dev’:
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:362:30: error: ‘GENHD_FL_NO_PART’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN’?
> 362 | gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:362:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>
> Hmm?
>
> I'm going to revert this one for now, not sure how it could've been
> tested in this form.
Because next-20211130 and later have commit 46e7eac647b34ed4 ("block:
rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART").
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
