> -----Original Message----- > From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:28 PM > To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; axboe@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx; hare@xxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() > for shared tags > > On 26/11/2021 11:51, John Garry wrote: > >> This patch set improves above call trace even after disk_util=0 is set. > > ok, fine. Thanks for testing. > > > > So I guess that this is a regression, and you would want this series > > for v5.16, right? My changes were made with v5.17 in mind. > > > > I am not sure how Jens feels about it, since the changes are > > significant. It would be a lot easier to argue for v5.16 if we got to > > this point earlier in the cycle... > > > > note: I will now resend for 5.17 and add your tested-by, please let me > know if > unhappy about that. John - 5.17 should be OK. I am doing additional testing and so far no issue. Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Anyway, it would be good to have full review first, so please help > > with that. > > > > @Ming, can you please give feedback on 3/3 here? > > Thanks and also to Hannes for the reviews. > > john
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
