Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in blkdev_put (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/11/28 14:32, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> If we can unconditionally start __loop_clr_fd() upon ioctl(LOOP_CLR_FD), I think
> we can avoid circular locking between disk->open_mutex and flush_workqueue().

Too bad. There is ioctl(LOOP_SET_STATUS) which allows forcing __loop_clr_fd() to be
called without ioctl(LOOP_CLR_FD). We have to support __loop_clr_fd() upon lo_release().

Is dropping disk->open_mutex inside lo_release()
( https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4bdc6b1-701d-6cc1-5d42-65564d2aa089@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ) possible?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux