[PATCH RFC 01/11] btrfs: update an stale comment on btrfs_submit_bio_hook()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This function is renamed to btrfs_submit_data_bio(), update the comment
and add extra reason why it doesn't completely follow the same rule in
btrfs_submit_data_bio().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 91f7ed27e421..91c59b6e279d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -8197,7 +8197,13 @@ static inline blk_status_t btrfs_submit_dio_bio(struct bio *bio,
 	bool write = btrfs_op(bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE;
 	blk_status_t ret;
 
-	/* Check btrfs_submit_bio_hook() for rules about async submit. */
+	/*
+	 * Check btrfs_submit_data_bio() for rules about async submit.
+	 *
+	 * The only exception is for RAID56, when there are more than one bios
+	 * to submit, async submit seems to make it harder to collect csums
+	 * for the full stripe.
+	 */
 	if (async_submit)
 		async_submit = !atomic_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->sync_writers);
 
-- 
2.34.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux