On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:27:34PM +0800, John Garry wrote: > Typedefs busy_iter_fn and busy_tag_iter_fn are now identical, so delete > busy_iter_fn to reduce duplication. > > It would be nicer to delete busy_tag_iter_fn, as the name busy_iter_fn is > less specific. > > However busy_tag_iter_fn is used in many different parts of the tree, > unlike busy_iter_fn which is just use in block/, so just take the > straightforward path now, so that we could rename later treewide. > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Ming
