Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: avoid extra iter advance with async iocb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 05:21:34PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -352,11 +352,21 @@ static ssize_t __blkdev_direct_IO_async(struct kiocb *iocb,
>  	bio->bi_end_io = blkdev_bio_end_io_async;
>  	bio->bi_ioprio = iocb->ki_ioprio;
>  
> -	ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
> -	if (unlikely(ret)) {
> -		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> -		bio_endio(bio);
> -		return ret;
> +	if (!iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
> +		ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
> +		if (unlikely(ret)) {
> +			bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +			bio_endio(bio);
> +			return ret;
> +		}

Nit: I generally find it much nicer to read if simple if statements
don't use pointless negations.

> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Users don't rely on the iterator being in any particular
> +		 * state for async I/O returning -EIOCBQUEUED, hence we can
> +		 * avoid expensive iov_iter_advance(). Bypass
> +		 * bio_iov_iter_get_pages() and set the bvec directly.
> +		 */
> +		bio_iov_bvec_set(bio, iter);

So if this optimization is so useful, please also do it for
non-bvec iov_iters, which is what 99% of the applications actually
use.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux