Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: blk_mq_rq_ctx_init cache ctx/q/hctx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/21 07:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:37:28PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
We should have enough of registers in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(), store them
in local vars, so we don't keep reloading them.

note: keeping q->elevator may look unnecessary, but it's also used
inside inlined blk_mq_tags_from_data().

Is this really making a difference?  I'd expect todays hyper-optimizing
compilers to not be tricked into specific register allocations just by
adding a local variable.

Looking again, there are only reads before the use site, so indeed
shouldn't matter. Was left from first versions of the patch where
it wasn't the case.

--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux