On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 07:37:37PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > We have exactly one caller of this, just get rid of adding the useless > function name to the output. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 07:37:37PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > We have exactly one caller of this, just get rid of adding the useless > function name to the output. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>