Re: [PATCH 8/9] io_uring: utilize the io_batch infrastructure for more efficient polled IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/14/21 10:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:45:38AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/14/21 2:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:54:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> @@ -2404,6 +2406,11 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool force_nonspin)
>>>>  		struct kiocb *kiocb = &req->rw.kiocb;
>>>>  		int ret;
>>>>  
>>>> +		if (!file)
>>>> +			file = kiocb->ki_filp;
>>>> +		else if (file != kiocb->ki_filp)
>>>> +			break;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Can you explain why we now can only poll for a single file (independent
>>> of the fact that batching is used)?
>>
>> Different file may be on a different backend, it's just playing it
>> safe and splitting it up. In practice it should not matter.
> 
> Well, with file systems even the same file can land on different
> devices.  Maybe we need a cookie?
> 
> Either way this should be commented as right now it looks pretty
> arbitrary.

I got rid of this and added a dev_id kind of cookie that gets matched
on batched addition.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux