On 10/13/21 10:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:04:36AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/13/21 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:42:23AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> Something like this? >>> >>> Something like that. Although without making the new function inline >>> this will generate an indirect call. >> >> It will, but I don't see how we can have it both ways... > > Last time I played with these optimization gcc did inline function > pointers passed to __always_inline function into the calling > function. That is you can keep the source level abstraction but get the > code generation as if it was open coded. Gotcha, so place nvme_complete_batch() in the nvme.h header. That might work, let me give it a whirl. -- Jens Axboe
