Re: [PATCH 3/4] block/mq-deadline: Stop using per-CPU counters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/26/21 17:19, Damien Le Moal wrote:
Another thing: in patch 3, you are actually not handling the overflows. So
dd_queued() may return some very weird number (temporarily) when the inserted
count overflows before the completed count does. Since
dd_dispatch_aged_requests() does not care about the actual value of dd_queued(),
only if it is 0 or not, I am not 100% sure if it is useful to fix. Except maybe
for sysfs attributes ?

Hmm ... I'm not following. I think it can be proven mathematically that
dd_queued() returns a number in the range [0, max_queued_requests). Here is
an example:
* inserted = 1 (wrapped around).
* completed = UINT32_MAX - 1 (about to wrap but has not yet wrapped around).
* dd_queued() returns 2.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux