Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-crypto-fallback: properly prefix function and struct names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/21 10:22 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and
> structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback.  Instead, use
> "blk_crypto_fallback_".  Some places already did this, but others
> didn't.
> 
> This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to
> mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like).
> Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot".
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good, it might be useful to mention this patch doesn't change
any functionality, not a hard requirement though.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx>






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux