BFQ cgroup weights range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

The default weight for proportional IO control associated with a cgroup
is 100 [1]. The minimum allowed weight is 1 [2] and the maximum weight
1000 [3].  This is a bit inconsistent with general cgroup weight
semantic where def/min == max/def (i.e. symmetric adjustments to both
sides) [4].

1) Is there a reason why the maximum allowed weight is (only) 1000?
   (E.g. it won't be possible to ensure 10^4 ratio of proportional
   control but 10^3 is achievable.)
2) Is the default value 100 special or absolute in a sense? (I suspect
   it is, the unchangeable weight of root cgroup members. Therefore two
   siblings with equal ratios 10:100 and 100:1000 would behave same only
   when there's no interfering IO from the root.)

Thanks,
Michal

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/block/bfq-cgroup.c?h=v5.14-rc7#n513
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/block/bfq-iosched.h?h=v5.14-rc7#n18
[3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/block/bfq-iosched.h?h=v5.14-rc7#n19
[4] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst?h=v5.14-rc7#n602



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux