Re: False waker detection in BFQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 23-08-21 15:58:25, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > Currently I'm running wider set of benchmarks for the patches to see
> > whether I didn't regress anything else. If not, I'll post the patches to
> > the list.
> 
> Any news?

It took a while for all those benchmarks to run. Overall results look sane,
I'm just verifying by hand now whether some of the localized regressions
(usually specific to a particular fs+machine config) are due to a measurement
noise or real regressions...

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux