On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 09:06:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/20/21 4:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's been a while since I ran blktests. If I run it against Jens' for-next
> > branch (39916d4054e7 ("Merge branch 'for-5.15/io_uring' into for-next")) a
> > slab-out-of-bounds access complaint appears. Is anyone already looking into
> > this?
>
> Does this help?
Btw, we still have the memset based initialization in bio_reset.
We should probably add a shared function for the common initialization
between bio_init and bio_reset and then remove BIO_RESET_BYTES
entirely, and just document the fields that survive a reset in
in the struct definition.
