@@ -2346,8 +2345,11 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
unsigned int hctx_idx)
{
+ struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags;
struct page *page;
+ drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
Hi Ming,
Indent.
That's intentional, as we have from later patch:
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags
*tags, unsigned int hctx_idx)
{
struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags;
struct page *page;
+ if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set->flags))
+ drv_tags = set->shared_sbitmap_tags;
+ else
drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
...
blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, tags);
}
And it's just nice to not re-indent later.
+
if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
int i;
@@ -2361,7 +2363,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
}
}
- blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, tags);
Maybe you can pass set->tags[hctx_idx] directly since there is only one
reference on it.
Again, intentional for similar reason, as above.
Thanks,
John