Re: [PATCH v2 61/63] powerpc: Split memset() to avoid multi-field overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le 18/08/2021 à 08:05, Kees Cook a écrit :
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
neighboring fields.

Instead of writing across a field boundary with memset(), move the call
to just the array, and an explicit zeroing of the prior field.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87czqsnmw9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
  drivers/macintosh/smu.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
index 94fb63a7b357..59ce431da7ef 100644
--- a/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
+++ b/drivers/macintosh/smu.c
@@ -848,7 +848,8 @@ int smu_queue_i2c(struct smu_i2c_cmd *cmd)
  	cmd->read = cmd->info.devaddr & 0x01;
  	switch(cmd->info.type) {
  	case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_SIMPLE:
-		memset(&cmd->info.sublen, 0, 4);
+		cmd->info.sublen = 0;
+		memset(&cmd->info.subaddr, 0, 3);

subaddr[] is a table, should the & be avoided ?
And while at it, why not use sizeof(subaddr) instead of 3 ?


  		break;
  	case SMU_I2C_TRANSFER_COMBINED:
  		cmd->info.devaddr &= 0xfe;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux