On 8/11/21 12:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
You write that this isn't the right way to collect per cgroup stats. What is
the "right way"? Has this been documented somewhere?
Well, there's nothing specific to mq-deadline or any other elevator or
controller about the stats that your patch collected and showed. That
seems like a pretty straight forward sign that it likely doens't
belong there.
Do you perhaps want these statistics to be reported via read-only cgroup
attributes of a new cgroup policy that is independent of any particular
I/O scheduler?
Thanks,
Bart.
