Hi folks, I am back from my leave of absence, so thank you everyone for your patience This proposal has been outstanding for a while and didn't seem to receive pushback, especially compared to the initial proposal Would it be the right time to put this modification up for a vote? Thanks, - Enrico Thanks, - Enrico On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:25 AM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:37:26PM -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: > > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > >> From: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM > > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk > > >> lifetime metrics > > >> To: <virtio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: <egranata@xxxxxxxxxx>, <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, > > >> <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > >> <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> > > >> In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the > > >> original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC > > >> spec which is not open > > >> > > >> Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields > > >> added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to > > >> make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime > > >> metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification > > >> > > >> This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add > > >> any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more > > >> clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> Changes in v2: > > >> - clarified JEDEC references; > > >> - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; > > >> - clarified reserved block references > > >> > > >> content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > Ping? > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [Enrico is currently on leave of absence] > > > > Is there any outstanding feedback from the linux-block folks? I've lost > > track of this, I'm afraid. (Your R-b is the only feedback I see on this > > list...) > > > > We can certainly put up a vote. This is one of the things I wanted to > > see fixed for the next release of the standard. > > I have CCed Christoph, linux-block@, and virtualization@. Here is the > link to the patch that we're discussing: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/patch/20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Stefan
