On 8/6/21 7:11 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
For a request that has a priority level equal to or larger than
IOPRIO_BE_NR, bfq_set_next_ioprio_data() prints a critical warning but
defaults to setting the request new_ioprio field to IOPRIO_BE_NR. This
is not consistent with the warning and the allowed values for priority
levels. Fix this by setting the request new_ioprio field to
IOPRIO_BE_NR - 1, the lowest priority level allowed.
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: aee69d78dec0 ("block, bfq: introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler")
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
