Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: rename IOPRIO_BE_NR

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 8/2/21 2:21 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>   /*
> - * 8 best effort priority levels are supported
> + * The RT an BE priority classes support up to 8 priority levels.
>    */
> -#define IOPRIO_BE_NR	(8)
> +#define IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS	(8)

Is this kind of change acceptable in a UAPI header? Can this change 
break the build of user space applications?

If this change is acceptable, how about the name IOPRIO_NR_BE_LEVELS? 
Additionally, please leave out the parentheses since these are not 
necessary.

Thanks,

Bart.