Tejun Heo wrote on 2021/7/31 12:07 上午:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:09:34AM +0800, brookxu wrote:
>>>> @@ -877,10 +900,19 @@ static inline void throtl_trim_slice(struct throtl_grp *tg, bool rw)
>>>> else
>>>> tg->bytes_disp[rw] = 0;
>>>>
>>>> - if (tg->io_disp[rw] >= io_trim)
>>>> + if (tg_io_disp(tg, rw) >= io_trim) {
>>>
>>> Instead of checking this in multiple places, would it be simpler to transfer
>>> the atomic counters to the existing counters whenever we enter blk-throtl
>>> and leave the rest of the code as-is?
>>
>> If we do this, we need to do similar processing on the bio submission path and the bio
>> resubmission path in pending_timer. It seems that the code is more complicated?
>
> Yeah, basically whenever we enter blk-throtl. Factored to a function,
> calling it on entry should be fairly clean, right? I wonder whether it'd be
> better to consolidate all atomic counter handling in a single location and
> all it does is transferring whatever's accumulated to the usual counters.
> Also, when you're reading & resetting the atomic counters, can you use a
> pattern like the following?
>
> main_counter += atomic_xchg(counter, 0);
>
> Right now, there's a race window between reading and resetting.
Yeah, thanks for your suggestion, I will submit the next version later.
> Thanks.
>
