Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] driver core: mark device as irq affinity managed if any irq is managed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8bxcuxv.ffs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> TLDR: virtio allocates ONE irq on msix_enable() and then when the guest
> actually unmasks another entry (e.g. request_irq()), it tears down the
> allocated one and set's up two. On the third one this repeats ....
> 
> There are only two options:
> 
>   1) allocate everything upfront, which is undesired
>   2) append entries, which might need locking, but I'm still trying to
>      avoid that
> 
> There is another problem vs. vector exhaustion which can't be fixed that
> way, but that's a different story.

FTI, NVMe is similar.  We need one IRQ to setup the admin queue,
which is used to query/set how many I/O queues are supported.  Just
two steps though and not unbound.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux