Re: [RFC 0/6] block: enhance use of GENHD_FL_UP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] block: enhance use of GENHD_FL_UP
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:56:07 +0100
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx, bvanassche@xxxxxxx, ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, osandov@xxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210715202341.2016612-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>
References: <20210715202341.2016612-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

So while patch 1 seems a little pointless given where I'd like to go,
the rest of the series goes exactly where I'd like to move things.
Can you respin this one quickly and send it out to Jens without the RFC?

References:
- [RFC 0/6] block: enhance use of GENHD_FL_UP
  - From: Luis Chamberlain

Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH 0/7] genirq/affinity: abstract new API from managed irq affinity spread
Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 1/7] genirq/affinity: remove the 'firstvec' parameter from irq_build_affinity_masks
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 5/6] nvme: replace GENHD_FL_UP with GENHD_FL_DISK_ADDED
Next by thread: [RFC 0/5] block: use flag enhancement for del_gendisk()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux